I think Facebook are using a new style of banning. Total blacklisting. " H# l9 J4 A/ G1 ?1 q我认为FB正在使用一种新的方式进行封禁。也就是永久（完全）黑名单。2 [% v- Q, \9 E2 M. V, {9 Q
Instant Policy Violation on any account launched by an account in any way connected to a violating account.7 L( D* t: A3 n) [
任何账户在运行时通过任何方式接触了一个违规账户，就会激活违规即时反应机制。 . s. `( G- L X; }3 Z/ u; ZI've tested a huge amount of variables since yesterday and the conclusion I've come to is that its linked to the email address/domain. ' |7 @& H: E. L! |; D; b& z! f7 R& G
我测试了非常多的变量直到昨天，结论是邮箱地址和链接是导致违规即时反应机制发生的原因。: g, ] P' l* u5 W$ Z( ~- }
I went as far as creating a new, separate Business Manager on a fresh, untouched account but using the same email address. Any ad launched also got hit by instant policy violation. 4 E. S- v3 D- c) u7 u我甚至创建了一个新的单独的BM，没有接触过任何账户只是使用同样的邮箱地址。任何广告在往上放时也被违规即时反应机制封禁了。 ! ~! ?/ L% ~2 R, U- g0 c1 ~% Y3 WI'm up and running again using an account with no email/domain link. , }9 B2 n: R- D3 m) |% l' I我在使用一个没有邮箱没有域名链接的账户。( C9 S1 C! G# h" ^. {& x' M6 I7 W
Moral of the story is, Facebook are taking policy violations a lot more seriously and trying to stop affiliates from doing what we do. Take it one of two ways: follow the crowd to whitehat or adapt and reap the rewards of an unsaturated blackhat marketplace. 3 } g% g; Z. n, ~* ?* z3 ~
这个事情告诉我们，FB正在使违规即时反应机制变得更加严格，并且在尝试禁止和我们一样跑黑五类的affiliate。那么最终的结果可能是两种：1.大量的人会涌入正规市场2.适应整个FB的改变，去接手剩下的不饱和黑五类市场。
发表于 2017-7-31 19:01:21
发表于 2017-7-31 21:16:45
发表于 2017-8-2 10:49:18
发表于 2017-8-14 09:17:56