I think Facebook are using a new style of banning. Total blacklisting. 4 T' Z: k! ?: L; [5 y* C+ ^
我认为FB正在使用一种新的方式进行封禁。也就是永久（完全）黑名单。 : Z5 ?) C# H3 y* [Instant Policy Violation on any account launched by an account in any way connected to a violating account.2 N. ]- [! |2 V/ A# `
任何账户在运行时通过任何方式接触了一个违规账户，就会激活违规即时反应机制。 ) G1 q7 } M( A- b# T0 S8 D1 xI've tested a huge amount of variables since yesterday and the conclusion I've come to is that its linked to the email address/domain. + k2 G5 \$ ^8 h; F0 T" o: z
我测试了非常多的变量直到昨天，结论是邮箱地址和链接是导致违规即时反应机制发生的原因。9 Y6 S2 a* \* h" v& x
I went as far as creating a new, separate Business Manager on a fresh, untouched account but using the same email address. Any ad launched also got hit by instant policy violation. 3 b9 w( a: y5 m我甚至创建了一个新的单独的BM，没有接触过任何账户只是使用同样的邮箱地址。任何广告在往上放时也被违规即时反应机制封禁了。: |6 ~" W$ {7 `: w' p3 r
I'm up and running again using an account with no email/domain link. 5 C% q$ |5 z, E! U3 l
我在使用一个没有邮箱没有域名链接的账户。/ p7 Y0 R1 D/ a) G( Z
Moral of the story is, Facebook are taking policy violations a lot more seriously and trying to stop affiliates from doing what we do. Take it one of two ways: follow the crowd to whitehat or adapt and reap the rewards of an unsaturated blackhat marketplace. 6 f/ A2 U" ~3 X" U" c% u这个事情告诉我们，FB正在使违规即时反应机制变得更加严格，并且在尝试禁止和我们一样跑黑五类的affiliate。那么最终的结果可能是两种：1.大量的人会涌入正规市场2.适应整个FB的改变，去接手剩下的不饱和黑五类市场。
发表于 2017-7-31 19:01:21
发表于 2017-7-31 21:16:45
发表于 2017-8-2 10:49:18
发表于 2017-8-14 09:17:56