I think Facebook are using a new style of banning. Total blacklisting. 6 k$ T `5 b; i# I我认为FB正在使用一种新的方式进行封禁。也就是永久（完全）黑名单。' u- M, Y% j2 W9 i7 @0 u$ r" f+ a
Instant Policy Violation on any account launched by an account in any way connected to a violating account. . v7 R5 n/ L! A. H0 D$ m 任何账户在运行时通过任何方式接触了一个违规账户，就会激活违规即时反应机制。 " q4 a* ~2 k6 j1 u w4 Z: oI've tested a huge amount of variables since yesterday and the conclusion I've come to is that its linked to the email address/domain. 6 O* R% X' @3 ~! Y1 z/ W7 \' n$ p, z
我测试了非常多的变量直到昨天，结论是邮箱地址和链接是导致违规即时反应机制发生的原因。 0 k' e% e, B+ M& V% A4 @I went as far as creating a new, separate Business Manager on a fresh, untouched account but using the same email address. Any ad launched also got hit by instant policy violation. % a' w( j% L9 M, {6 i* z; P
我甚至创建了一个新的单独的BM，没有接触过任何账户只是使用同样的邮箱地址。任何广告在往上放时也被违规即时反应机制封禁了。, ^* M. i8 L2 v4 S( [1 o2 b
I'm up and running again using an account with no email/domain link. / x3 j; ]4 C) L- k我在使用一个没有邮箱没有域名链接的账户。1 ?9 h9 v! r. w8 w
Moral of the story is, Facebook are taking policy violations a lot more seriously and trying to stop affiliates from doing what we do. Take it one of two ways: follow the crowd to whitehat or adapt and reap the rewards of an unsaturated blackhat marketplace. ' m/ k4 C) L9 x1 e0 b" [& w% c4 A) L这个事情告诉我们，FB正在使违规即时反应机制变得更加严格，并且在尝试禁止和我们一样跑黑五类的affiliate。那么最终的结果可能是两种：1.大量的人会涌入正规市场2.适应整个FB的改变，去接手剩下的不饱和黑五类市场。
发表于 2017-7-31 19:01:21
楼主
发表于 2017-7-31 21:16:45
发表于 2017-8-2 10:49:18
发表于 2017-8-14 09:17:56