I think Facebook are using a new style of banning. Total blacklisting. $ C4 V9 V" e( \. f5 u8 y
我认为FB正在使用一种新的方式进行封禁。也就是永久（完全）黑名单。, N" p8 x8 ?# O5 Y
Instant Policy Violation on any account launched by an account in any way connected to a violating account.! Z) H/ T$ E0 T- M/ t0 j8 S
任何账户在运行时通过任何方式接触了一个违规账户，就会激活违规即时反应机制。 8 G# x* e) A: ^! i9 R: V2 gI've tested a huge amount of variables since yesterday and the conclusion I've come to is that its linked to the email address/domain. , O6 q) M! T+ c. C5 }9 r" H我测试了非常多的变量直到昨天，结论是邮箱地址和链接是导致违规即时反应机制发生的原因。( F: N2 y6 x) d. Y+ _# R' Z* V
I went as far as creating a new, separate Business Manager on a fresh, untouched account but using the same email address. Any ad launched also got hit by instant policy violation. : \! l9 D* ]* t9 N/ B) d
我甚至创建了一个新的单独的BM，没有接触过任何账户只是使用同样的邮箱地址。任何广告在往上放时也被违规即时反应机制封禁了。 * O W+ I! y& E6 F1 W& n; {I'm up and running again using an account with no email/domain link. ; i2 ?7 m2 `) J& W我在使用一个没有邮箱没有域名链接的账户。 & f2 E! J) n$ Y0 [Moral of the story is, Facebook are taking policy violations a lot more seriously and trying to stop affiliates from doing what we do. Take it one of two ways: follow the crowd to whitehat or adapt and reap the rewards of an unsaturated blackhat marketplace. 8 p& O# o b4 W3 n7 q% H, H
这个事情告诉我们，FB正在使违规即时反应机制变得更加严格，并且在尝试禁止和我们一样跑黑五类的affiliate。那么最终的结果可能是两种：1.大量的人会涌入正规市场2.适应整个FB的改变，去接手剩下的不饱和黑五类市场。
发表于 2017-7-31 19:01:21
楼主
发表于 2017-7-31 21:16:45
发表于 2017-8-2 10:49:18
发表于 2017-8-14 09:17:56