|
|
The IPIDEA Proxy Network
3 q( D0 b$ o. V$ C; FOur analysis of residential proxy networks found that many well-known residential proxy brands are not only related but are controlled by the actors behind IPIDEA. This includes the following ostensibly independent proxy and 富强 brands: / e3 O9 c2 z5 h
$ v: ]) _6 @* {' d% O& |2 ?360 Proxy (360proxy\.com)
9 C8 W8 A* m1 ?6 X+ l
% r/ U' v `; p( H Z# ~922 Proxy (922proxy\.com), x( _) t& d1 y6 P# c
" ~0 g& G5 }$ m* ZABC Proxy (abcproxy\.com)
+ o6 ?5 X9 x" E4 E- {4 P( E) C- M$ C$ C
Cherry Proxy (cherryproxy\.com)) \$ S% l f4 p( q" R8 y) _9 e5 ]
& U8 E2 n2 P3 ~Door 富强 (door富强\.com)6 `5 p6 r' ~/ M' U5 ?( q) D0 X
$ G& f9 a% g) _! T) R! ~Galleon 富强 (galleon富强\.com)
- t6 w/ w! M+ g2 {8 ~3 W) q% R0 u# Q3 I1 W6 e! T- m
IP 2 World (ip2world\.com)
$ q: U' i2 K* t5 S" C2 P0 S( h' f, ]# ^: q- f L/ [7 Q6 _
Ipidea (ipidea\.io)* m# w4 E1 m$ B6 g- G) _' }
. H0 G9 R5 ]# z* z# F3 K
Luna Proxy (lunaproxy\.com)
$ O, h& c" J- O1 I2 ~7 J
7 ]/ I! \6 ]$ g1 N) A9 QPIA S5 Proxy (piaproxy\.com)
* d1 _/ j" v% @- I( e( O; E4 C+ T1 v; V" I2 A. o! v% e! p
PY Proxy (pyproxy\.com)- B+ j; j G' k& y
2 V* o( \ c, ^. }3 n0 WRadish 富强 (radish富强\.com)
) E" b2 b' M" I+ p; N X7 x& i b
Tab Proxy (tabproxy\.com)7 q1 i; i* ^8 ?$ B% N% e. J
9 o8 F' g9 j' E- S9 Q8 _; rThe same actors that control these brands also control several domains related to Software Development Kits (SDKs) for residential proxies. These SDKs are not meant to be installed or executed as standalone applications, rather they are meant to be embedded into existing applications. The operators market these kits as ways for developers to monetize their applications, and offer Android, Windows, iOS, and WebOS compatibility. Once developers incorporate these SDKs into their app, they are then paid by IPIDEA usually on a per-download basis. |
|
发表于 
楼主
发表于