|
|
楼主 |
发表于 2026-1-29 11:18:15
|
显示全部楼层
The IPIDEA Proxy Network
6 N/ Q3 b$ m' u8 I- s( u- Z, `# DOur analysis of residential proxy networks found that many well-known residential proxy brands are not only related but are controlled by the actors behind IPIDEA. This includes the following ostensibly independent proxy and 富强 brands: ! n5 w4 d; G4 T- n$ d9 s6 S% ^
) W" r5 K: Z+ Z- R" U360 Proxy (360proxy\.com)
( c" z* o* p0 N/ u5 v
& ^7 O% x" z' I4 Y/ D922 Proxy (922proxy\.com)
, ~4 @; `3 d( @+ J& I
9 D, }& y! g$ L D( hABC Proxy (abcproxy\.com)
/ H! z0 J, F& V- ]( B! Q5 U' v: p7 x
. l9 X4 g' r; F! ICherry Proxy (cherryproxy\.com)
2 h! G7 Z8 A6 W: D: B& }' Z- t, |7 Q( L& i$ m3 F+ K: S& a
Door 富强 (door富强\.com)
* _) n% X8 u2 _- ^7 }) p+ {4 P
6 H9 Q# }) R! pGalleon 富强 (galleon富强\.com)
6 f! S* J) r( l( R N: W9 U+ a' i2 T2 y) J
IP 2 World (ip2world\.com)+ L7 D& ^, C9 X9 n _2 U1 x0 \( W
9 ]" M7 Q- v$ h6 m8 PIpidea (ipidea\.io)
- q4 i% j& c g: A5 \$ r& N u. \$ A' [( z2 p; M
Luna Proxy (lunaproxy\.com)
7 P; u+ {& u& Z4 \+ k& Q: j, G# t& Z' p& m% C
PIA S5 Proxy (piaproxy\.com)5 P, M3 Z4 ]! n+ z+ q/ n' ]
2 K" Z/ ^3 @# Z+ r3 E- i9 ZPY Proxy (pyproxy\.com)& }* W3 R2 {9 y4 I8 l/ q. b
* D9 A4 _# t" T" J+ b" gRadish 富强 (radish富强\.com)1 U: F/ W J3 ~8 @$ c& E# N$ ]
: I5 i/ c' v4 x' p3 n; ^4 P4 jTab Proxy (tabproxy\.com)
0 e* s5 ~) e" S# h
@ P# J1 ]7 y) S9 h( {The same actors that control these brands also control several domains related to Software Development Kits (SDKs) for residential proxies. These SDKs are not meant to be installed or executed as standalone applications, rather they are meant to be embedded into existing applications. The operators market these kits as ways for developers to monetize their applications, and offer Android, Windows, iOS, and WebOS compatibility. Once developers incorporate these SDKs into their app, they are then paid by IPIDEA usually on a per-download basis. |
|